Triple

T16436571
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fool for Your Loving E399192 entity
Predicate hasKeyApprox P122783 FINISHED
Object E minor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E minor | Statement: [Fool for Your Loving, hasKeyApprox, E minor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyApprox
Context triple: [Fool for Your Loving, hasKeyApprox, E minor]
  • A. hasApproximateEntryCount
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a number representing an estimated or non-exact count of its entries.
  • B. hasApproximateMemberCount
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a group or collection for which only an estimated or non-exact number of members is known.
  • C. hasApproximateValue
    Indicates that one entity’s value is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value of another entity within an acceptable margin of error.
  • D. hasKeyPrediction
    Indicates that one entity contains or provides a primary or most important predicted value or outcome for another entity.
  • E. hasKeyStrait
    Indicates that one entity possesses or controls a strategically important strait that is crucial for access, passage, or connectivity to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32ba224988190b7cccc42f35e54de completed April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e22701d2288190bf8676050758f172 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e24556c1348190902a4d116c3137d9 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.