Triple
T16434793
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al. |
E399153
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOutcomeForLeadDefendant |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conviction on multiple counts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conviction on multiple counts | Statement: [State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al., legalOutcomeForLeadDefendant, conviction on multiple counts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOutcomeForLeadDefendant Context triple: [State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al., legalOutcomeForLeadDefendant, conviction on multiple counts]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
C.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
E.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ba1023481909588aa6a3c677886 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e22701d2288190bf8676050758f172 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.