Triple
T16434748
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2007 Knoxville murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom |
E399152
|
entity |
| Predicate | appeals |
P10643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multiple appeals filed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple appeals filed | Statement: [2007 Knoxville murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, appeals, multiple appeals filed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appeals Context triple: [2007 Knoxville murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, appeals, multiple appeals filed]
-
A.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
-
B.
appeal
chosen
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
C.
appealBeyond
Indicates that something has significance, relevance, or attractiveness that extends beyond a specified scope, group, or context.
-
D.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
E.
typeOfAppeals
Indicates the specific category or kind of appeals associated with or applied to a given case, decision, or legal action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ba1023481909588aa6a3c677886 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e22701d2288190bf8676050758f172 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.