Triple
T16434637
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People of the State of California |
E399150
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalCaseCaptionFormat |
P122773
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
People of the State of California v. [Defendant]
"People of the State of California v. [Defendant]" is the standard way of naming a criminal or civil enforcement case in California where the state, on behalf of its residents, prosecutes or brings legal action against an individual or entity.
|
E1213483
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: People of the State of California v. [Defendant] | Statement: [People of the State of California, typicalCaseCaptionFormat, People of the State of California v. [Defendant]]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: People of the State of California v. [Defendant] Context triple: [People of the State of California, typicalCaseCaptionFormat, People of the State of California v. [Defendant]]
-
A.
Fernandez v. California
Fernandez v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police may conduct a warrantless search of a home with the consent of one occupant even if another occupant previously objected but is no longer present.
-
B.
State of California v. Robert Durst
State of California v. Robert Durst was the Los Angeles County murder trial in which real estate heir Robert Durst was prosecuted for the 2000 killing of his longtime friend Susan Berman.
-
C.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
-
D.
Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
The Superior Court of California, County of Riverside is the trial court of general jurisdiction serving Riverside County, handling civil, criminal, family, probate, and other state law matters across multiple courthouse locations.
-
E.
Miller v. California
Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: People of the State of California v. [Defendant] Triple: [People of the State of California, typicalCaseCaptionFormat, People of the State of California v. [Defendant]]
Generated description
"People of the State of California v. [Defendant]" is the standard way of naming a criminal or civil enforcement case in California where the state, on behalf of its residents, prosecutes or brings legal action against an individual or entity.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: People of the State of California v. [Defendant] Target entity description: "People of the State of California v. [Defendant]" is the standard way of naming a criminal or civil enforcement case in California where the state, on behalf of its residents, prosecutes or brings legal action against an individual or entity.
-
A.
Fernandez v. California
Fernandez v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police may conduct a warrantless search of a home with the consent of one occupant even if another occupant previously objected but is no longer present.
-
B.
State of California v. Robert Durst
State of California v. Robert Durst was the Los Angeles County murder trial in which real estate heir Robert Durst was prosecuted for the 2000 killing of his longtime friend Susan Berman.
-
C.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
-
D.
Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
The Superior Court of California, County of Riverside is the trial court of general jurisdiction serving Riverside County, handling civil, criminal, family, probate, and other state law matters across multiple courthouse locations.
-
E.
Miller v. California
Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalCaseCaptionFormat Context triple: [People of the State of California, typicalCaseCaptionFormat, People of the State of California v. [Defendant]]
-
A.
typicalCaseTypes
Indicates the kinds or categories of cases that are most commonly associated with or handled by a given entity.
-
B.
preferredCapitalization
Indicates the specific way a term’s letters should be capitalized when it is written or displayed.
-
C.
letterCase
Indicates the relationship between a character or string and its typographical case (such as uppercase, lowercase, or mixed case).
-
D.
capitalizedOn
Indicates that one entity took advantage of, exploited, or made beneficial use of an opportunity, situation, or resource provided or created by another entity.
-
E.
recognizesCapital
Indicates that one entity acknowledges or identifies another entity as the capital of a given region or country.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (7 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ba1023481909588aa6a3c677886 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0045872a688190bcab27c6a2b952cd |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:44 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a00464f264081908faef31ef15f378a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:48 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a004767d1c88190814e83f09383e874 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e22701d2288190bf8676050758f172 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e24556c1348190902a4d116c3137d9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.