Triple

T16418984
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eschenmoser sulfide contraction E398761 entity
Predicate involvesBondChange P122495 FINISHED
Object C–S bond cleavage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C–S bond cleavage | Statement: [Eschenmoser sulfide contraction, involvesBondChange, C–S bond cleavage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvesBondChange
Context triple: [Eschenmoser sulfide contraction, involvesBondChange, C–S bond cleavage]
  • A. involvesForceBond
    Indicates a relationship in which two or more entities are connected through a special Force-based bond that links their sensations, emotions, or abilities.
  • B. involves
    Indicates that an entity participates in, is a part of, or is implicated within a particular event, process, or relationship.
  • C. bondedWith
    Indicates that two entities are joined by a strong, enduring connection or attachment, whether emotional, social, or structural.
  • D. changesWith
    Indicates that one entity varies or is modified in response to changes in another entity.
  • E. bondBroken chosen
    Indicates that a previously existing bond or connection between entities has been severed or is no longer intact.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2b9024819085c20e52de95d583 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3287a3d348190831b12101d8449b6 completed April 18, 2026, 6:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.