Triple

T16410598
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bordeaux Supérieur AOC E398551 entity
Predicate hasYieldRestrictions P99 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Bordeaux Supérieur AOC, hasYieldRestrictions, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasYieldRestrictions
Context triple: [Bordeaux Supérieur AOC, hasYieldRestrictions, yes]
  • A. hasAwardRestriction
    Indicates that there is a limitation, condition, or constraint placed on receiving or granting an award.
  • B. hasSemanticRestriction
    Indicates that a concept or relation is constrained in meaning or usage by specific semantic conditions or limitations.
  • C. hasLimitation chosen
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
  • D. mayHaveRestriction
    Indicates that an entity can be subject to one or more limitations, conditions, or constraints, though such restrictions are not necessarily present.
  • E. hasExportRestriction
    Indicates that an entity is subject to limitations or controls on exporting it to other jurisdictions or parties.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2950248190bc8ad9b9bebdc8c8 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e328731a408190b38dcab0b7bb65ff completed April 18, 2026, 6:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.