Triple

T16407299
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ramesses IV E398466 entity
Predicate usedIconography P37204 FINISHED
Object traditional Ramesside royal imagery LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional Ramesside royal imagery | Statement: [Ramesses IV, usedIconography, traditional Ramesside royal imagery]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedIconography
Context triple: [Ramesses IV, usedIconography, traditional Ramesside royal imagery]
  • A. iconographyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of visual symbolism or imagery used to represent something.
  • B. iconographyFeature
    Indicates a visual element or motif that appears as a distinct feature within a work’s iconography.
  • C. importanceInIconography
    Indicates the degree to which something holds symbolic or thematic significance within a particular iconographic or visual-representational tradition.
  • D. iconographicFunction
    Indicates the symbolic or representational role that something serves within an image or visual composition.
  • E. iconographyInfluence chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s visual symbols, motifs, or stylistic elements have shaped or informed the iconographic style or imagery of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2950248190bc8ad9b9bebdc8c8 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e327d36b808190b6b8c412ae0d2faa completed April 18, 2026, 6:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.