Triple
T16405732
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wiot |
E398420
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOnomasticStatus |
P19196
|
FINISHED |
| Object | archaic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: archaic | Statement: [Wiot, hasOnomasticStatus, archaic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOnomasticStatus Context triple: [Wiot, hasOnomasticStatus, archaic]
-
A.
hasOnomasticField
Indicates a relationship where something is associated with a specific onomastic field, i.e., a domain or category related to names or naming conventions.
-
B.
exonymStatus
Indicates the status or classification of a name used in one language to refer to a place, people, or entity known by a different name in its own language.
-
C.
namesakeStatus
Indicates that one entity serves as the namesake of another, or that two entities share a relationship based on having the same name.
-
D.
nameStatus
chosen
Indicates the status or condition associated with an entity’s name, such as whether it is current, preferred, alternate, or deprecated.
-
E.
toponymStatus
Indicates the status or classification of a place name within a geographic naming or toponymic system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2950248190bc8ad9b9bebdc8c8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e327d2b4e48190b7153f198639e9cd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e226fe1dd08190865c181721f8c348 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:09 a.m.