Triple

T16383412
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 E397862 entity
Predicate distinctFrom P1612 FINISHED
Object Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 E285979 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 | Statement: [Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, distinctFrom, Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Context triple: [Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, distinctFrom, Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]
  • A. Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a federal provision that protects the voting rights of certain language minorities, particularly Puerto Rican–educated U.S. citizens, by prohibiting states from denying them the right to vote based on English literacy requirements.
  • B. Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a provision that was challenged but ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in South Carolina v. Katzenbach as a valid exercise of Congress’s power to enforce voting rights protections.
  • C. Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a “bail-in” provision that allows federal courts to place jurisdictions with proven intentional voting discrimination under preclearance requirements for changes to their election laws.
  • D. Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
    Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a provision that established federal oversight mechanisms for certain jurisdictions’ voting changes, forming part of the Act’s broader framework to prevent racial discrimination in voting.
  • E. Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act chosen
    Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was the provision that established the coverage formula determining which jurisdictions were subject to federal preclearance requirements for changes to their voting laws.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2880b48190ae1a9673a3bbef80 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e319de83248190b5d43646fa9b6cda completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a003c55bba481909bca6cc17e1dfcf5 completed May 10, 2026, 8:05 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:08 a.m.