Triple
T16379447
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sir Eyck of Denesle |
E397760
|
entity |
| Predicate | originWorkLanguage |
P85137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Polish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polish | Statement: [Sir Eyck of Denesle, originWorkLanguage, Polish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originWorkLanguage Context triple: [Sir Eyck of Denesle, originWorkLanguage, Polish]
-
A.
originalLanguageOfWholeWork
Indicates that a given language is the primary or original language in which an entire work (such as a book, film, or other complete creation) was first produced or expressed.
-
B.
languageOfParentWork
Indicates that the specified language is the language in which the parent (original or containing) work is expressed.
-
C.
originalLanguageCountry
Indicates the country where a work’s original language is primarily spoken or officially used.
-
D.
originalLanguageOfWinningWorks
Indicates the language in which the works that won an award or competition were originally created or written.
-
E.
languageOfUnderlyingWork
chosen
Indicates the language in which the original or underlying work (from which a derived or related work stems) is expressed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2880b48190ae1a9673a3bbef80 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e319da3c6c8190a9ccf744996c31e8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e226f94dd48190b7b8e0e983738a67 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:08 a.m.