Triple
T16365134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inor language |
E397413
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNeighboringLanguage |
P16383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chaha language |
E397412
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chaha language | Statement: [Inor language, hasNeighboringLanguage, Chaha language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chaha language Context triple: [Inor language, hasNeighboringLanguage, Chaha language]
-
A.
Chaha language
chosen
Chaha is an Afroasiatic Semitic language of the Gurage group spoken primarily in southwestern Ethiopia.
-
B.
Shekkacho language
The Shekkacho language is an Afroasiatic Omotic language spoken primarily by the Shekka people in the Sheka Zone of southwestern Ethiopia.
-
C.
Katcha language
The Katcha language is a Kadu (Kadugli) language spoken by the Katcha people of the Nuba Mountains region in Sudan.
-
D.
Kharia language
Kharia language is a Munda language spoken primarily by the Kharia people in eastern India, especially in the states of Jharkhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh.
-
E.
Halchidhoma language
The Halchidhoma language is an extinct Yuman language once spoken by the Halchidhoma people along the lower Colorado River in the southwestern United States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2778dc8190aa95c7572db127e6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2ff3c915c81909e1757fc31921876 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a003c50763881908b115953961efef9 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:08 a.m.