Triple
T16363738
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XO |
E397379
|
entity |
| Predicate | developmentTarget |
P86660
|
FINISHED |
| Object | low-cost Macintosh |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: low-cost Macintosh | Statement: [XO, developmentTarget, low-cost Macintosh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developmentTarget Context triple: [XO, developmentTarget, low-cost Macintosh]
-
A.
developmentVariant
Indicates that one entity is a variant or alternative form of another in the context of development (e.g., a different developmental version, configuration, or pathway).
-
B.
developedOn
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a particular platform, technology, or environment.
-
C.
developmentArc
Indicates the progression and transformation of something over time, typically outlining key stages of growth, change, or maturation within a broader narrative or process.
-
D.
developedWith
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
-
E.
targetedDevice
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the specific device toward which another entity’s action, effect, or configuration is directed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2778dc8190aa95c7572db127e6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2ff3aada88190a6e01f04c494a6ac |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e226f37ecc819082af58b29b4e39d1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:08 a.m.