Triple

T16359839
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject cross potent with four crosslets E397280 entity
Predicate symbolicInterpretation P102883 FINISHED
Object five wounds of Christ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: five wounds of Christ | Statement: [cross potent with four crosslets, symbolicInterpretation, five wounds of Christ]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: symbolicInterpretation
Context triple: [cross potent with four crosslets, symbolicInterpretation, five wounds of Christ]
  • A. hasSymbolicInterpretation chosen
    Indicates that one entity is understood or used as a symbolic representation or metaphorical stand-in for another entity or concept.
  • B. symbolizedIn
    Indicates that one entity serves as a symbol or representation of another entity.
  • C. intendedInterpretation
    Indicates that one entity is meant to be understood or interpreted in a particular way, sense, or meaning relative to another.
  • D. containsInterpretationOf
    Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
  • E. interpretiveConsequence
    Indicates that one entity is a conclusion, implication, or interpretive outcome that follows from another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2778dc8190aa95c7572db127e6 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2fad241848190a9f32c7b050f20a5 completed April 18, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e226f37ecc819082af58b29b4e39d1 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:07 a.m.