Triple
T1635822
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ISA |
E35357
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibilityGoal |
P30800
|
FINISHED |
| Object | industry-wide standard for PC expansion |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: industry-wide standard for PC expansion | Statement: [ISA, compatibilityGoal, industry-wide standard for PC expansion]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibilityGoal Context triple: [ISA, compatibilityGoal, industry-wide standard for PC expansion]
-
A.
notCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities cannot function together properly or are unsuitable for joint use or interaction.
-
B.
backwardCompatibleWith
Indicates that one entity can correctly interpret, use, or function with data, interfaces, or behavior designed for an earlier version of another entity.
-
C.
backwardCompatibility
Indicates that one entity remains functional or compatible when used with an earlier version or older form of another entity.
-
D.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
E.
compatibilityNote
Indicates that there is an explanatory note or comment about how well two entities are compatible or work together.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a96083e7308190abbf025fe8e43abb |
completed | March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907cac610819083cafd4396b6d66c |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a9607716b4819092187f8c08daaf31 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.