Triple
T16348187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parks and Recreation Division |
E396988
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJurisdiction |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Michigan state parks |
E611638
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Michigan state parks | Statement: [Parks and Recreation Division, hasJurisdiction, Michigan state parks]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Michigan state parks Context triple: [Parks and Recreation Division, hasJurisdiction, Michigan state parks]
-
A.
Michigan state park system
chosen
The Michigan state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and recreation areas across Michigan that protect natural and cultural resources while providing outdoor activities such as camping, hiking, and beach access.
-
B.
Indiana state park system
The Indiana state park system is a network of publicly protected natural and recreational areas across Indiana that preserve the state’s landscapes and provide opportunities for outdoor activities such as hiking, camping, and wildlife viewing.
-
C.
Michigan state forest system
The Michigan state forest system is a network of publicly managed forest lands across Michigan dedicated to conservation, recreation, and sustainable resource use.
-
D.
Wisconsin state park system
The Wisconsin state park system is a network of publicly managed parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas across Wisconsin that protect natural resources and provide outdoor recreation opportunities.
-
E.
Minnesota state park system
The Minnesota state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and recreation areas across Minnesota that protect natural and cultural resources while providing outdoor recreation opportunities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f26864c819088365ca381a003c2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2da10ef64819092633e8b32e98f5d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0035587c3481908448f75e5a56d2cb |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:07 a.m.