Triple
T1632709
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases |
E35290
|
entity |
| Predicate | chargingInstrumentTypes |
P30762
|
FINISHED |
| Object | complaints |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: complaints | Statement: [State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases, chargingInstrumentTypes, complaints]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chargingInstrumentTypes Context triple: [State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases, chargingInstrumentTypes, complaints]
-
A.
chargesVia
Indicates that one entity charges or powers another entity using a specified medium, method, or interface.
-
B.
chargeOftenUsed
Indicates that an entity is frequently subjected to or associated with a particular charge (such as a legal, financial, or electrical charge).
-
C.
hasCharge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific electrical or formal charge, such as positive, negative, or neutral.
-
D.
mainCharge
Indicates that one charge in a set of legal accusations is designated as the primary or most significant offense.
-
E.
charge
Indicates that one entity formally accuses another of an offense or imposes a financial cost or obligation on them.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a96083e7308190abbf025fe8e43abb |
completed | March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907cac610819083cafd4396b6d66c |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a9607716b4819092187f8c08daaf31 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.