Triple

T1632683
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases E35290 entity
Predicate opposesPartyType P30760 FINISHED
Object criminal defendant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criminal defendant | Statement: [State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases, opposesPartyType, criminal defendant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposesPartyType
Context triple: [State of Oregon in Multnomah County criminal cases, opposesPartyType, criminal defendant]
  • A. rivalParty
    Indicates that one party is in competition or opposition with another party, often pursuing conflicting goals or interests.
  • B. hasOppositionParties
    Indicates that an entity (typically a government or ruling body) has one or more political parties that formally oppose or challenge its policies or authority.
  • C. opposedConference
    Indicates that one entity actively resists, counters, or works against another entity within the context of a conference or formal gathering.
  • D. opposedLeader
    Indicates that one entity actively resisted, challenged, or worked against the leadership or authority of another entity.
  • E. electionOpponent
    Indicates that two individuals are rivals competing against each other in the same election.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a96083e7308190abbf025fe8e43abb completed March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907cac610819083cafd4396b6d66c completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a9607716b4819092187f8c08daaf31 completed March 5, 2026, 10:52 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.