Triple
T1632100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF QUIC Working Group |
E35277
|
entity |
| Predicate | product |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 9114 |
E8958
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 9114 | Statement: [IETF QUIC Working Group, product, RFC 9114]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 9114 Context triple: [IETF QUIC Working Group, product, RFC 9114]
-
A.
RFC 9114
chosen
RFC 9114 is the Internet standard that specifies HTTP/3, the version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol that runs over the QUIC transport protocol.
-
B.
RFC 9113
RFC 9113 is the Internet standards document that specifies the HTTP/2 protocol, defining its framing, semantics, and operational behavior on the web.
-
C.
RFC 9111
RFC 9111 is an IETF specification that defines HTTP caching semantics, detailing how responses can be stored, reused, and validated to improve web performance and efficiency.
-
D.
RFC 9112
RFC 9112 is the IETF specification that standardizes the semantics and behavior of HTTP/1.1.
-
E.
RFC 8314
RFC 8314 is an Internet standard that specifies the use of mandatory encryption (TLS) for email submission and access protocols to improve the security of email communications.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a909f6ee1881908f0753a77a2c4665 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad6815c4588190bccfbece8f22c1a1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 12:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.