Triple
T16319555
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Gambia |
E396253
|
entity |
| Predicate | ICJProceedingsStatus |
P50738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | case admitted and proceeding on the merits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: case admitted and proceeding on the merits | Statement: [The Gambia, ICJProceedingsStatus, case admitted and proceeding on the merits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ICJProceedingsStatus Context triple: [The Gambia, ICJProceedingsStatus, case admitted and proceeding on the merits]
-
A.
legalStatusOfProceedings
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of a set of legal proceedings within a judicial or administrative process.
-
B.
judicialStatus
Indicates the legal or court-related condition or standing of an entity within a judicial process (e.g., pending, decided, appealed).
-
C.
ICJDecision
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling has been issued by the International Court of Justice concerning a dispute or legal question between parties.
-
D.
courtStatus
chosen
Indicates the current legal or procedural state of a case or matter within a court system.
-
E.
judicialReviewStatus
Indicates whether and how a decision, action, or law has been or can be examined, challenged, or ruled upon by a judicial authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f255b788190a400eba031dd85d8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e296b4ad448190b2b195a5e0032c6e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219fc72c881909d452274e7af8238 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:06 a.m.