Triple
T1631666
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 855 |
E35268
|
entity |
| Predicate | series |
P1761
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC series |
E5627
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC series | Statement: [RFC 855, series, RFC series]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC series Context triple: [RFC 855, series, RFC series]
-
A.
RFCs
chosen
RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
-
B.
RFC 1195
RFC 1195 is the IETF standard that extends the IS-IS routing protocol to support multiple network layer protocols, including IP.
-
C.
RFC 855
RFC 855 is an Internet standards document that specifies the Telnet protocol’s options and mechanisms for remote terminal communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 1906
RFC 1906 is an Internet standard that specifies the transport mappings for SNMPv2, detailing how SNMP messages are carried over various network protocols.
-
E.
RFC 2467
RFC 2467 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document that originally specified aspects of IPv6 over certain network technologies before later being superseded by RFC 6557.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a909f5ae98819091ce5e00eb4256a2 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad58d79bc88190bfc62f53dd8e8b90 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 11:09 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.