Triple
T1631602
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 854 |
E35267
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedRFC |
P9936
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
RFC 860
RFC 860 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet Timing Mark option, used to synchronize and manage timing in Telnet connections.
|
E190515
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 860 | Statement: [RFC 854, relatedRFC, RFC 860]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 860 Context triple: [RFC 854, relatedRFC, RFC 860]
-
A.
RFC 760
RFC 760 is an early Internet standard document authored by Jon Postel that specifies the original Internet Protocol (IP).
-
B.
RFC 857
RFC 857 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet protocol option for echoing characters, specifying how user input is echoed back in Telnet sessions.
-
C.
RFC 855
RFC 855 is an Internet standards document that specifies the Telnet protocol’s options and mechanisms for remote terminal communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 783
RFC 783 is the original specification that defines the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), a simple protocol for transferring files over a network.
-
E.
RFC 858
RFC 858 is an early Internet standard that defines the Telnet protocol’s status option, specifying how a Telnet client and server can exchange information about their current status.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: RFC 860 Triple: [RFC 854, relatedRFC, RFC 860]
Generated description
RFC 860 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet Timing Mark option, used to synchronize and manage timing in Telnet connections.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 860 Target entity description: RFC 860 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet Timing Mark option, used to synchronize and manage timing in Telnet connections.
-
A.
RFC 760
RFC 760 is an early Internet standard document authored by Jon Postel that specifies the original Internet Protocol (IP).
-
B.
RFC 857
RFC 857 is an Internet standard that defines the Telnet protocol option for echoing characters, specifying how user input is echoed back in Telnet sessions.
-
C.
RFC 855
RFC 855 is an Internet standards document that specifies the Telnet protocol’s options and mechanisms for remote terminal communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 783
RFC 783 is the original specification that defines the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), a simple protocol for transferring files over a network.
-
E.
RFC 858
RFC 858 is an early Internet standard that defines the Telnet protocol’s status option, specifying how a Telnet client and server can exchange information about their current status.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a909f5ae98819091ce5e00eb4256a2 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad79813b2c819093bf3833db398f22 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ad79ed9e088190af70b57ef85609b9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ad7a42bb5c8190858adc55200151ec |
completed | March 8, 2026, 1:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.