Triple

T1631433
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 821 E35264 entity
Predicate networkModelLayer P6553 FINISHED
Object application layer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: application layer | Statement: [RFC 821, networkModelLayer, application layer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: networkModelLayer
Context triple: [RFC 821, networkModelLayer, application layer]
  • A. networkSection
    Indicates that one entity represents a specific section, segment, or subdivision within a larger network structure.
  • B. OSIModelLayer chosen
    Indicates the specific layer within the OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) model at which a networking function, protocol, or interaction operates.
  • C. networkType
    Indicates the category or kind of network associated with or used by an entity (e.g., wired, wireless, virtual, or specific protocol-based networks).
  • D. network
    Indicates that one entity is connected to or interacts with another through a system of relationships, communication, or information exchange.
  • E. linkLayer
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is connected to another at the data link (Layer 2) level of a network stack, enabling direct frame-level communication between them.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a9431af5ac8190893133f1ae490142 completed March 5, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907c91c888190b6ed295c1a2e0977 completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.