Triple

T1631425
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 821 E35264 entity
Predicate protocolType P11823 FINISHED
Object application-layer protocol LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: application-layer protocol | Statement: [RFC 821, protocolType, application-layer protocol]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protocolType
Context triple: [RFC 821, protocolType, application-layer protocol]
  • A. protocolNumber
    Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a protocol that governs or documents an interaction, process, or agreement between entities.
  • B. protocol
    Indicates that one entity defines or follows a specific set of rules or procedures governing how it interacts or communicates with another entity.
  • C. protocolVersion
    Indicates the specific version of a protocol that governs how two or more entities communicate or interact.
  • D. protocolLayer chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a communication protocol operates at, or is associated with, a specific layer in a protocol stack or network architecture.
  • E. transportProtocol
    Indicates the communication protocol used to transport data between entities in a networked interaction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886036bc081909ff5de16dbe5e8ea completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a9431af5ac8190893133f1ae490142 completed March 5, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907c91c888190b6ed295c1a2e0977 completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.