Triple

T16297648
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United Kingdom foreign policy E395689 entity
Predicate previouslyCoordinatedWith P435 FINISHED
Object Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union E155099 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union | Statement: [United Kingdom foreign policy, previouslyCoordinatedWith, Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union
Context triple: [United Kingdom foreign policy, previouslyCoordinatedWith, Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union]
  • A. Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU
    The Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU is the framework through which European Union member states coordinate their external relations, diplomacy, and security and defense policies on the international stage.
  • B. Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Union
    The Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Union are the diplomatic missions through which each EU country represents its government, negotiates, and coordinates its positions within the EU’s decision-making process.
  • C. Overseas Association Decision of the Council of the European Union
    The Overseas Association Decision of the Council of the European Union is the key legal framework that governs the special relationship, rights, and cooperation arrangements between the EU and its Overseas Countries and Territories.
  • D. Convention on the Future of Europe
    The Convention on the Future of Europe was a body convened by the European Union from 2002 to 2003 to draft a constitutional treaty and propose institutional reforms for the EU’s future governance.
  • E. Common Foreign and Security Policy chosen
    The Common Foreign and Security Policy is the European Union’s framework for coordinating and implementing joint diplomatic and security actions among its member states on the global stage.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previouslyCoordinatedWith
Context triple: [United Kingdom foreign policy, previouslyCoordinatedWith, Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union]
  • A. coordinatedWith chosen
    Indicates that two or more entities have worked together in an organized, cooperative manner toward a shared task, goal, or activity.
  • B. coordinatedFrom
    Indicates that an action, event, or process is organized, directed, or managed starting from a particular source location or entity.
  • C. formerlyConnectedTo
    Indicates that two entities were once connected or associated in some way, but that connection no longer exists.
  • D. previouslyEstablished
    Indicates that the relationship or condition it connects has already been formed or confirmed at an earlier time before the current context.
  • E. coordina
    Indicates that one entity organizes, directs, or harmonizes the actions or efforts of another entity or group toward a common goal.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f23bb088190a16fbb91a1957ea5 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e25e2f486c8190b73c15f59335cde2 completed April 17, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a001f9b42248190a3c8c2647a42aeb9 completed May 10, 2026, 6:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219fa5508819097e9d383348bf174 completed April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:06 a.m.