Triple
T16285122
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Historicism |
E395369
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnAuthor |
P122525
|
FINISHED |
| Object | author as historically situated subject |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: author as historically situated subject | Statement: [New Historicism, viewOnAuthor, author as historically situated subject]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnAuthor Context triple: [New Historicism, viewOnAuthor, author as historically situated subject]
-
A.
viewOnAuthority
Indicates how an entity perceives, evaluates, or relates to authority, including attitudes toward obedience, legitimacy, and power structures.
-
B.
viewedBy
Indicates that something has been seen, observed, or watched by a particular entity.
-
C.
viewOnPaul
Indicates that an entity holds a particular opinion, perspective, or stance regarding Paul.
-
D.
basedOnAuthor
Indicates that one entity is derived from, inspired by, or otherwise created on the basis of the work or contributions of a particular author.
-
E.
viewIs
Indicates that one entity is a visual representation or perspective of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f22c7248190a54c949738441e2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e24913a55081909a9a5a7a7f4806cc |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219f68d308190b71c1601303f0628 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e21e56e0348190a3d9475360231a70 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:05 a.m.