Triple
T16264408
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dirck van Mierevelt |
E394836
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableStudent |
P4838
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Willem van der Vliet |
E80757
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Willem van der Vliet | Statement: [Dirck van Mierevelt, notableStudent, Willem van der Vliet]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Willem van der Vliet Context triple: [Dirck van Mierevelt, notableStudent, Willem van der Vliet]
-
A.
Willem van der Vliet
chosen
Willem van der Vliet was a Dutch Golden Age painter from Delft, known for his portraits and history paintings and as an early mentor to his nephew Hendrick Cornelisz. van Vliet.
-
B.
Jan van der Vliet
Jan van der Vliet was a Dutch artist associated with the Delft painters’ Guild of Saint Luke during the Dutch Golden Age.
-
C.
Jan van Vliet
Jan van Vliet was a 17th-century Dutch scholar and philologist known for his work on Germanic languages and early Dutch history.
-
D.
Willem van Vliet
Willem van Vliet is a relatively obscure individual whose name is noted primarily as a bearer of the Dutch surname "van Vliet."
-
E.
Willem Delff
Willem Delff was a Dutch Golden Age engraver and painter from Delft, known for his detailed reproductive engravings after prominent artists of his time.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f221d8081909b0b2063e7528ba2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e245c672248190a4261be4696d52c5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00a5047a7c8190bac0ac9888547d16 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:05 a.m.