Triple
T16263551
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cairo, Georgia |
E394814
|
entity |
| Predicate | county |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Grady County |
E650576
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grady County | Statement: [Cairo, Georgia, county, Grady County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Grady County Context triple: [Cairo, Georgia, county, Grady County]
-
A.
Grady County
chosen
Grady County is a rural county in southwestern Georgia, United States, known for its agricultural economy and for having Cairo as its county seat.
-
B.
Grady County
Grady County is a county in central Oklahoma known for its agricultural economy and communities such as Chickasha.
-
C.
Treutlen County
Treutlen County is a rural county in east-central Georgia, known for its small population, agricultural landscape, and county seat of Soperton.
-
D.
Lumpkin County
Lumpkin County is a county in northern Georgia known historically as a center of the Georgia Gold Rush and for its location in the Appalachian foothills.
-
E.
Choctaw County
Choctaw County is a rural county in southwestern Alabama known for its pine forests, timber industry, and small, close-knit communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f221d8081909b0b2063e7528ba2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e245c672248190a4261be4696d52c5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a008a2156008190a079c9f1b721d40a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:04 a.m.