Triple
T16254500
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indo-Pacific hypothesis |
E394593
|
entity |
| Predicate | currentConsensus |
P109194
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not demonstrated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not demonstrated | Statement: [Indo-Pacific hypothesis, currentConsensus, not demonstrated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currentConsensus Context triple: [Indo-Pacific hypothesis, currentConsensus, not demonstrated]
-
A.
hasCurrentConsensus
chosen
Indicates that there is a presently agreed-upon or widely accepted position, judgment, or state regarding the related entities.
-
B.
viewOnConsensus
Indicates the stance or opinion an entity holds regarding a consensus or commonly agreed-upon position.
-
C.
supportsConsensus
Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or contributes to the achievement or maintenance of a shared agreement or collective decision among multiple parties.
-
D.
adoptedByConsensus
Indicates that a decision, action, or change was formally accepted through a consensus process among the relevant participants.
-
E.
consensusMechanism
Indicates the method or protocol by which multiple participants in a distributed system agree on a single, consistent state or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2171208190951025e526947816 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e24599861881908b9235f005d80a96 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219f259e88190bf49d8408c04178e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:04 a.m.