Triple

T16252028
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hans Kieslowski E394531 entity
Predicate hasMetafictionalContext P12417 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hans Kieslowski, hasMetafictionalContext, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMetafictionalContext
Context triple: [Hans Kieslowski, hasMetafictionalContext, true]
  • A. hasMetafictionalRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity plays a role within a story that self-consciously comments on, references, or breaks the conventions of fiction itself.
  • B. hasFictionalContent
    Indicates that something contains or includes material that is imaginary, invented, or not intended to represent real events or facts.
  • C. hasMetaphoricalContent
    Indicates that something contains or expresses meaning through metaphorical, rather than purely literal, content.
  • D. hasFictionalScope
    Indicates that something pertains to, applies within, or is limited to a fictional or imagined context rather than real-world scope.
  • E. hasLiteraryContext
    Indicates that something is associated with, situated within, or explained by a particular literary context (such as a work, genre, period, or interpretive framework).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2171208190951025e526947816 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e24597b74481908fdb8175628a57a1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219ee6f6481909663b388dc99770a completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:04 a.m.