Triple
T16244560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Julia Meade |
E394336
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterLivesUnderNewIdentity |
P108643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Julia Meade, laterLivesUnderNewIdentity, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterLivesUnderNewIdentity Context triple: [Julia Meade, laterLivesUnderNewIdentity, yes]
-
A.
laterIdentityContinuityWith
Indicates that an entity at a later time is considered the same continuing individual or identity as an entity at an earlier time.
-
B.
unawareOfTrueIdentityOf
Indicates that one entity does not know or recognize the real or actual identity of another entity.
-
C.
hasImaginedIdentity
Indicates that an entity mentally constructs or adopts a non-actual identity, role, or persona for itself or another entity.
-
D.
hasMultipleIdentities
chosen
Indicates that a single entity is associated with more than one distinct identity or persona.
-
E.
adoptedIdentity
Indicates that one entity has taken on or assumed the identity, role, or persona of another entity, either formally or informally.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2171208190951025e526947816 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e24560c6848190ae0e85ecb11a9264 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219ee6f6481909663b388dc99770a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:04 a.m.