Triple

T16235321
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Council of Governors in India E394093 entity
Predicate scopeOfDiscussion P18525 FINISHED
Object Centre–state relations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Centre–state relations | Statement: [Council of Governors in India, scopeOfDiscussion, Centre–state relations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scopeOfDiscussion
Context triple: [Council of Governors in India, scopeOfDiscussion, Centre–state relations]
  • A. subjectMatterScope chosen
    Indicates the thematic or topical domain that an action, statement, or resource pertains to or falls within.
  • B. scopeType
    Indicates the specific range, level, or context within which a given relationship, rule, or action is defined or applies.
  • C. scopeOfContribution
    Indicates the specific area, domain, or extent within which an entity’s contribution or involvement applies.
  • D. scopeOfAdvice
    Indicates that one entity defines or specifies the range, boundaries, or subject matter covered by another entity’s advice or guidance.
  • E. discussedAs
    Indicates that one entity is talked about, treated, or examined in terms of another entity, often as an example, case, or framing concept.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f204df88190a8f88923decf9835 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e24559af48819092e4b466778b07e2 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219ee6f6481909663b388dc99770a completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:04 a.m.