Triple
T1622833
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Palermo FC |
E35070
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTraditionalColors |
P31069
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pink and black |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pink and black | Statement: [Palermo FC, hasTraditionalColors, pink and black]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalColors Context triple: [Palermo FC, hasTraditionalColors, pink and black]
-
A.
hasTraditionalSymbol
Indicates that something is associated with or represented by a conventional or culturally established symbol.
-
B.
isTraditional
Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
-
C.
hasTraditionalName
Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
-
D.
hasColorOption
Indicates that an entity offers or supports a particular color as one of its selectable options.
-
E.
hasTraditionalFormIn
Indicates that something possesses a customary or historically established form or representation within a specified context, system, or location.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886023194819080a3fccd6e325d0e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf4a0ef748190ae52b9656474c0ef |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907c731808190a1d998155041b3c1 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a99ca48c888190876500df1a885c11 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 3:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:28 p.m.