Triple

T16218876
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pelagian controversy E393665 entity
Predicate positionOfOpponents P75206 FINISHED
Object affirmation of original sin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: affirmation of original sin | Statement: [Pelagian controversy, positionOfOpponents, affirmation of original sin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOfOpponents
Context triple: [Pelagian controversy, positionOfOpponents, affirmation of original sin]
  • A. positionOpposed chosen
    Indicates that two entities hold positions or stances that are in direct conflict or opposition to each other.
  • B. axisOpponentsAssisted
    Indicates that the subject entity provided assistance or support to opponents of the Axis powers.
  • C. opponentState
    Indicates the condition or status that an opposing party or competitor is currently in within a given context or interaction.
  • D. opponentStrategy
    Indicates that one entity employs or represents a strategic plan specifically designed to counter or compete against another entity.
  • E. opposingLocation
    Indicates that two entities are located directly opposite each other, typically across a defined reference such as a street, corridor, or boundary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f204df88190a8f88923decf9835 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e227f95de081908e1abe32d281dbe7 completed April 17, 2026, 12:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219e94a448190b73a4e6aa374eb4a completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.