Triple

T16216988
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tsesarevich E393617 entity
Predicate associatedLanguageForm P106922 FINISHED
Object Цесаревич LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Цесаревич | Statement: [Tsesarevich, associatedLanguageForm, Цесаревич]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedLanguageForm
Context triple: [Tsesarevich, associatedLanguageForm, Цесаревич]
  • A. hasLanguageFormOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific linguistic form, expression, or realization of the language used by another entity.
  • B. linguisticallyRelatedTo
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a linguistic relationship, such as sharing a common language, origin, structure, or other language-based association.
  • C. linkedToLanguage
    Indicates that an entity has an association or connection with a specific language, such as being expressed in, related to, or dependent on that language.
  • D. languageForm
    Indicates the specific linguistic form or expression in which something is conveyed or represented.
  • E. closelyAssociatedLanguage
    Indicates that one language is closely connected to another, such as through frequent co-use, mutual influence, or strong cultural or regional association.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e227f660708190b6581ecfe218a15c completed April 17, 2026, 12:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219e94a448190b73a4e6aa374eb4a completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.