Triple

T16205804
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hollingsworth v. Perry E393324 entity
Predicate priorCase P3138 FINISHED
Object Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
E1201266 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Perry v. Schwarzenegger | Statement: [Hollingsworth v. Perry, priorCase, Perry v. Schwarzenegger]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Context triple: [Hollingsworth v. Perry, priorCase, Perry v. Schwarzenegger]
  • A. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • B. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
    League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
  • C. Navarette v. California
    Navarette v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that an anonymous 911 tip about dangerous driving can provide reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
  • D. Perry v. New Hampshire
    Perry v. New Hampshire is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when the Due Process Clause requires judges to screen eyewitness identifications for reliability in the absence of police misconduct.
  • E. Miller v. California
    Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Triple: [Hollingsworth v. Perry, priorCase, Perry v. Schwarzenegger]
Generated description
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Target entity description: Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
  • A. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • B. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
    League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
  • C. Navarette v. California
    Navarette v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that an anonymous 911 tip about dangerous driving can provide reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
  • D. Perry v. New Hampshire
    Perry v. New Hampshire is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when the Due Process Clause requires judges to screen eyewitness identifications for reliability in the absence of police misconduct.
  • E. Miller v. California
    Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2270f047c819084645da27759a3d2 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a00078fa2ac8190a0a2cf38bc41498d completed May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a000900bfbc8190b21eb513838759a9 completed May 10, 2026, 4:26 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a000a0fc93c819088d9233aaa5e2017 completed May 10, 2026, 4:31 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.