Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC]

Target entity: Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC]

• A. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held naturally occurring human genes cannot be patented, reshaping the legal landscape for biotechnology and genetic testing.
• B. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• C. In re Diehr
  In re Diehr is a landmark 1981 U.S. Supreme Court patent law decision that clarified the patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
• D. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
• E. Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Basic Inc. v. Levinson is a landmark 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the fraud-on-the-market theory and clarified the materiality standard for misstatements in securities fraud class actions.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC]

Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden of proof in patent licensee declaratory judgment actions, holding that the patent holder—not the licensee—bears the burden of proving infringement.

Target entity: Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
Target entity description: Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden of proof in patent licensee declaratory judgment actions, holding that the patent holder—not the licensee—bears the burden of proving infringement.

• A. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held naturally occurring human genes cannot be patented, reshaping the legal landscape for biotechnology and genetic testing.
• B. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• C. In re Diehr
  In re Diehr is a landmark 1981 U.S. Supreme Court patent law decision that clarified the patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
• D. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the conflict between federal procedural rules and state laws limiting class actions in federal diversity jurisdiction.
• E. Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Basic Inc. v. Levinson is a landmark 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the fraud-on-the-market theory and clarified the materiality standard for misstatements in securities fraud class actions.
• F. None of above. chosen