Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.]

Target entity: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.]

• A. Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.
  Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. is a landmark U.S. copyright and trademark case in which the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski, held that the song "Barbie Girl" was protected parody and did not infringe Mattel’s rights in the Barbie doll.
• B. Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
  Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
• C. Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Basic Inc. v. Levinson is a landmark 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the fraud-on-the-market theory and clarified the materiality standard for misstatements in securities fraud class actions.
• D. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
  Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
• E. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.
  District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co. is a 1953 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of an 1872 D.C. civil rights law prohibiting racial discrimination in restaurants.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.]

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of who has standing to sue for false advertising under the Lanham Act.

Target entity: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
Target entity description: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of who has standing to sue for false advertising under the Lanham Act.

• A. Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.
  Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. is a landmark U.S. copyright and trademark case in which the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski, held that the song "Barbie Girl" was protected parody and did not infringe Mattel’s rights in the Barbie doll.
• B. Williamson v. Lee Optical Co.
  Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that became a leading precedent for the highly deferential rational basis review of economic regulation under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
• C. Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Basic Inc. v. Levinson is a landmark 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the fraud-on-the-market theory and clarified the materiality standard for misstatements in securities fraud class actions.
• D. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
  Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
• E. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.
  District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co. is a 1953 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of an 1872 D.C. civil rights law prohibiting racial discrimination in restaurants.
• F. None of above. chosen