Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States]

Target entity: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States]

• A. United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
  United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
• B. Gelbard v. United States
  Gelbard v. United States is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether grand jury witnesses could refuse to answer questions based on the government's alleged illegal use of wiretap evidence.
• C. Abrams v. United States
  Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
• D. United States v. Rabinowitz
  United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
• E. United States v. Bajakajian
  United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
Triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States]

Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government does not retain an implied reversionary interest in railroad rights-of-way granted under an 1875 statute once the railroad abandons them.

Target entity: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
Target entity description: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government does not retain an implied reversionary interest in railroad rights-of-way granted under an 1875 statute once the railroad abandons them.

• A. United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
  United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
• B. Gelbard v. United States
  Gelbard v. United States is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether grand jury witnesses could refuse to answer questions based on the government's alleged illegal use of wiretap evidence.
• C. Abrams v. United States
  Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
• D. United States v. Rabinowitz
  United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
• E. United States v. Bajakajian
  United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
• F. None of above. chosen