Triple
T16205750
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | October Term 2013 |
E393323
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hall v. Florida |
E576852
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hall v. Florida | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Hall v. Florida]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hall v. Florida Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Hall v. Florida]
-
A.
Hall v. Florida
chosen
Hall v. Florida is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited states’ ability to impose strict IQ cutoffs when determining intellectual disability in capital cases, thereby refining the application of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on executing individuals with intellectual disabilities.
-
B.
Proffitt v. Florida
Proffitt v. Florida is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, upheld the constitutionality of guided-discretion capital sentencing schemes under the Eighth Amendment.
-
C.
Hamilton v. Alabama
Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.
-
D.
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited Congress’s power to subject non-consenting states to lawsuits in federal court, reinforcing state sovereign immunity.
-
E.
Dobbert v. Florida
Dobbert v. Florida is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a death sentence and clarified the limits of the Ex Post Facto Clause in the context of changes to capital punishment procedures.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2270f047c819084645da27759a3d2 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00078fa2ac8190a0a2cf38bc41498d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.