Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Riley v. California | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Riley v. California]

Target entity: Riley v. California
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Riley v. California]

• A. Riley v. California chosen
  Riley v. California is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
• B. Gilbert v. California
  Gilbert v. California is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a defendant’s post-indictment lineup identification without counsel present violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
• C. Giles v. California
  Giles v. California is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that a defendant forfeits the right to confront a witness only if the defendant intended to prevent that witness from testifying.
• D. Griffin v. California
  Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
• E. Cohen v. California
  Cohen v. California is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly expanded First Amendment protections for offensive and provocative speech in public settings.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.