Triple
T16205740
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | October Term 2013 |
E393323
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action |
E232007
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action]
-
A.
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
-
B.
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
-
C.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
-
D.
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action)
chosen
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) is Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s powerful Supreme Court dissent criticizing a Michigan constitutional amendment that banned race-conscious admissions policies in public universities.
-
E.
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2270f047c819084645da27759a3d2 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a000ed13b40819096de333872225730 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.