Triple
T16204643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lule Sámi |
E393292
|
entity |
| Predicate | closelyRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | North Sámi |
E406024
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: North Sámi | Statement: [Lule Sámi, closelyRelatedTo, North Sámi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: North Sámi Context triple: [Lule Sámi, closelyRelatedTo, North Sámi]
-
A.
North Sámi
chosen
North Sámi is a Uralic language spoken by the Sámi people of northern Norway, Sweden, and Finland, and is the most widely used of the Sámi languages.
-
B.
Southern Lule Sámi
Southern Lule Sámi is a regional variety of the Lule Sámi language traditionally spoken by Sámi communities in the southern part of the Lule Sámi area of northern Scandinavia.
-
C.
Eastern Sami
Eastern Sami is a subgroup of the Sami languages spoken in northeastern Fennoscandia and northwestern Russia, characterized by several highly endangered and moribund varieties.
-
D.
Lule Sámi
Lule Sámi is a Uralic, Indigenous Sámi language spoken primarily in northern Sweden and Norway.
-
E.
Pite Sámi
Pite Sámi is an endangered Uralic language traditionally spoken by the Sámi people in the Arjeplog area of northern Sweden.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1f5bd08190bd01cac0d5b9d2ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e2270d6e5c8190aee4bcca76cbe47c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0084a88dc08190a78973bc71f179d4 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:03 a.m.