Triple
T16191620
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry |
E392953
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalConflict |
P3010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | investigation into fraudulent domestic partnership |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: investigation into fraudulent domestic partnership | Statement: [I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry, hasLegalConflict, investigation into fraudulent domestic partnership]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalConflict Context triple: [I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry, hasLegalConflict, investigation into fraudulent domestic partnership]
-
A.
hasLegalIssue
Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
-
B.
conflictWithLaw
Indicates that an action, situation, or entity violates, contradicts, or is incompatible with a law or legal regulation.
-
C.
hasLegalProceeding
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
D.
hasLegalRelevanceIn
Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasNotableConflict
Indicates a significant, recognized dispute, clash, or opposition existing between the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1e49ac8190a311b54d32990576 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e222d5769c8190bbb604bfa095a1a5 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219e11f6081909106b1240a17fd37 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.