Triple
T16188612
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kemantney |
E392874
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternativeName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Qimant language |
E1199490
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Qimant language | Statement: [Kemantney, alternativeName, Qimant language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Qimant language Context triple: [Kemantney, alternativeName, Qimant language]
-
A.
Qimant language
chosen
The Qimant language is an endangered Central Cushitic (Agaw) language of northwestern Ethiopia, traditionally spoken by the Qemant people and now largely replaced by Amharic.
-
B.
Teguima language
The Teguima language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Opata people of northern Mexico.
-
C.
Kintaq language
The Kintaq language is a minor Aslian (Austroasiatic) language spoken by an indigenous community in Peninsular Malaysia.
-
D.
Kwinti language
The Kwinti language is an endangered Creole language spoken by the Kwinti Maroon community in Suriname, influenced by English, Dutch, and West African languages.
-
E.
Rengma language
Rengma language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken primarily by the Rengma Naga people in the northeastern region of India.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1e49ac8190a311b54d32990576 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e222d3a8e48190bdf29a633f4b0490 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0007899b408190abcb7e72bdc81e9d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.