Triple

T16188330
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ARSOUTH E392865 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfCommand P7157 FINISHED
Object operational-level Army headquarters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: operational-level Army headquarters | Statement: [ARSOUTH, hasTypeOfCommand, operational-level Army headquarters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfCommand
Context triple: [ARSOUTH, hasTypeOfCommand, operational-level Army headquarters]
  • A. typeOfCommand chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of command in relation to another entity.
  • B. hasCommand
    Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a specific command or directive applied to another entity or process.
  • C. containsCommand
    Indicates that one entity includes or embeds a command directed at or executable by another entity.
  • D. hasComponentCommand
    Indicates that an entity includes or controls another entity as a subordinate or component command within an organizational or command structure.
  • E. hasCommandResponsibilityFor
    Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control over, and is responsible for directing and overseeing, the actions or operations of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1e49ac8190a311b54d32990576 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e222d3a8e48190bdf29a633f4b0490 completed April 17, 2026, 12:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219e11f6081909106b1240a17fd37 completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.