Triple

T16180338
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A-Spec E392666 entity
Predicate distinctionFromBaseModels P6335 FINISHED
Object more aggressive design cues LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: more aggressive design cues | Statement: [A-Spec, distinctionFromBaseModels, more aggressive design cues]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: distinctionFromBaseModels
Context triple: [A-Spec, distinctionFromBaseModels, more aggressive design cues]
  • A. differentiatedFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity is distinguished or set apart from another by identifying differences between them.
  • B. isDistinguishedBy
    Indicates that one entity is characterized or set apart from others by a particular feature, quality, or attribute.
  • C. mechanicallyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities differ in their mechanical properties, structure, or behavior such that they are not mechanically equivalent or interchangeable.
  • D. isModelOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation or abstraction that captures the structure or behavior of another entity.
  • E. isDistinctFrom
    Indicates that two entities are not identical and can be clearly distinguished from one another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1e49ac8190a311b54d32990576 completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2205c92b48190b7125dbbcff3662e completed April 17, 2026, 11:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219d642708190ba31a90dce76a210 completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.