Triple

T16178297
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California's 22nd congressional district E392621 entity
Predicate hasIssueSalience P29037 FINISHED
Object agricultural policy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agricultural policy | Statement: [California's 22nd congressional district, hasIssueSalience, agricultural policy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIssueSalience
Context triple: [California's 22nd congressional district, hasIssueSalience, agricultural policy]
  • A. hasNotableIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant problem, concern, or defect that is noteworthy or exceptional compared to typical cases.
  • B. hasIssueWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
  • C. hasRecentIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an issue or problem that has occurred within a recent or specified time frame.
  • D. involvesIssue chosen
    Indicates that an action, event, or entity is related to, concerns, or includes a particular issue.
  • E. hasPriorityIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an issue that is marked as high or urgent priority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1d32208190942e4e499a80c18c completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e2205ab3108190a84fc2dfe61d5044 completed April 17, 2026, 11:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219d642708190ba31a90dce76a210 completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.