Triple

T16174179
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grenache-Syrah-Mourvèdre E392518 entity
Predicate SyrahContribution P102176 FINISHED
Object color intensity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: color intensity | Statement: [Grenache-Syrah-Mourvèdre, SyrahContribution, color intensity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SyrahContribution
Context triple: [Grenache-Syrah-Mourvèdre, SyrahContribution, color intensity]
  • A. wineStyleContribution chosen
    Indicates how much a given factor or component influences or shapes the overall style or character of a wine.
  • B. wineStyle
    Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
  • C. oenologicalSignificance
    Indicates the relationship in which something holds importance, relevance, or notable impact within the context of wine or winemaking.
  • D. wineLaw
    Indicates a legal or regulatory relationship governing the production, sale, labeling, or distribution of wine.
  • E. wineComponent
    Indicates that one entity is a constituent ingredient or part of a wine represented by the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f1d32208190942e4e499a80c18c completed April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e21eb9b8208190b60874cec7a3a98e completed April 17, 2026, 11:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e219d642708190ba31a90dce76a210 completed April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.