Triple
T16172677
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Communes of Haute-Garonne |
E392477
|
entity |
| Predicate | areIdentifiedBy |
P3732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | INSEE commune code |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: INSEE commune code | Statement: [Communes of Haute-Garonne, areIdentifiedBy, INSEE commune code]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areIdentifiedBy Context triple: [Communes of Haute-Garonne, areIdentifiedBy, INSEE commune code]
-
A.
identifiedUsing
Indicates that one entity was recognized, distinguished, or determined by means of a specified method, tool, or identifier.
-
B.
identifierFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a unique identifying label or code for another entity.
-
C.
helpsIdentify
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves to distinguish, recognize, or determine the identity or characteristics of another entity.
-
D.
areRecognizedBy
Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity as valid, known, or legitimate.
-
E.
alternativeIdentification
Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative identifier or reference for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1d32208190942e4e499a80c18c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e21eb88c948190a1d8b5518694ad53 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219d642708190ba31a90dce76a210 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.