Triple
T16171914
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Woolworth’s lunch counter (Greensboro) |
E392458
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithLawContext |
P2132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jim Crow segregation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jim Crow segregation | Statement: [Woolworth’s lunch counter (Greensboro), associatedWithLawContext, Jim Crow segregation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithLawContext Context triple: [Woolworth’s lunch counter (Greensboro), associatedWithLawContext, Jim Crow segregation]
-
A.
legalContext
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
-
B.
linkedLaw
Indicates that there is a connection or reference between an entity and a specific law or legal provision.
-
C.
associatedWithCourt
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected to a specific court, such as through jurisdiction, affiliation, or involvement in legal proceedings.
-
D.
legalCaseRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
E.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f1d32208190942e4e499a80c18c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e21eb7ab1481908fc35bfc8c56e5f2 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e219d642708190ba31a90dce76a210 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:02 a.m.